Lloyd v. Salon Xtensions LLC

4:25-cv-00921AredOct 29, 2025

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
CENTRAL DIVISION
BRIAN LLOYD 	PLAINTIFF
v. 	No. 4:25-cv-921-DPM
SALON XTENSIONS LLC 	DEFENDANT
ORDER
1. 	Lloyd 	moves 	the 	Court to 	enter 	default 	judgment 	against
Salon Xtensions. 	The Court, however, is unable to conclude that he
obtained 	good 	service 	on Salon. 	The 	paperwork 	has 	many 	gaps.
Neither 	Lloyd's 	declaration 	nor 	the 	attached 	proofs 	of 	service are
signed. 	Doc. 6 at 4 & 7. 	Salon's registered agents are not identified.
The delivery information on one tracking report is numbers rather than
a person or company and illegible on the other report. 	Doc. 6 at 5 & 8.
And Lloyd has provided no citations to Florida or Wyoming law (the
states of attempted service), or to the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
supporting the adequacy of attempted service.
2. 	The Court sets aside the Clerk's default, Doc. 8.
3. 	Lloyd has until 4 December 2025 to get good service. 	If he
needs more time, he may move for a good-cause extension. Fed. R. Civ.
P. 4(m).
4. 	The Court directs the Clerk to re-issue summons and mail it to
Lloyd. Motion, Doc. 6, denied.
Case 4:25-cv-00921-DPM Document 9 Filed 10/29/25 Page 1 of 2
So Ordered.
~yl.d/JL:(/
D .P. Marshall Jr.
United States District Judge
-2-
Case 4:25-cv-00921-DPM Document 9 Filed 10/29/25 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.