4:25-cv-00930•Robertson v. Sander et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION MICHAEL ROBERTSON PLAINTIFF v. CASE NO. 4:25-CV-00930-BSM SARAH SANDER, et al. DEFENDANTS ORDER After de novo review of the record, United States Magistrate Judge Benecia B. Moore’s recommended disposition [Doc. No. 8] is adopted, Michael Robertson’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis [Doc. No. 5] is denied, and his amended complaint [Doc. No. 6] is dismissed without prejudice because he has had at least three previous actions dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim, and has not shown that he is currently in imminent danger of serious physical injury or paid the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) (prisoners may not proceed in forma pauperis if three or more of their claims have been dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or failure to state a claim, unless they show they are in imminent danger of serious physical injury). If Robertson wishes to continue this case, he must submit the statutory and administrative fees of $405 to the Clerk of Court with a motion to reopen the case. An in forma pauperis appeal of this order would not be taken in good faith. IT IS SO ORDERED this 28th day of October, 2025. ________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 4:25-cv-00930-BSM Document 13 Filed 10/28/25 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.