Mahony v. Ratchford et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS
FORT SMITH DIVISION
KAREN MAHONY 	PLAINTIFF
V. 	CASE NO. 2:26-CV-2134
MYLE RATCHFORD; MAKAYLA MAHONY;
MICHEL MEYERS; CHERALYN MAHONY;
SARA ADAMS (also known as Sara Davis);
SERGEANT DOUG GILLIAM (Franklin County
Sheriff’s Department); DEPUTY HARRISON
NEWHART (Franklin County Sheriff’s Department);
DISPATCHER ATHENA PELLS (Franklin County,
Arkansas); ERNIE WITT (Attorney, Franklin County,
Arkansas); CHARLES HOSKYN (Attorney,
Franklin County, Arkansas); KALEB BRAUMGARTEN
(Attorney, Franklin County, Arkansas); and
FRANKLIN COUNTY, ARKANSAS 	DEFENDANTS
ORDER
Now before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 7) of the
Honorable Mark E. Ford, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of
Arkansas. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties.
The Court has reviewed this case and, being well and sufficiently advised, finds
that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be and hereby is ADOPTED
IN ITS ENTIRETY. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that upon preservice screening
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A, Plaintiff’s Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 3)
and Motion for Service (Doc. 4) are DENIED, and her Complaint (Doc. 2) is DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED on this 15th day of October, 2026.
/s/ Timothy L. Brooks
TIMOTHY L. BROOKS
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 2:26-cv-02134-TLB Document 8 Filed 10/15/26 Page 1 of 1 PageID #:
<pageID>