White v. Pornhub et al

2:26-cv-00548AzdFeb 18, 2026

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
WO
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Davon Chadewick White,
Plaintiff,
v.
Pornhub, et al.,
Defendants.
No. CV-26-00548-PHX-JAT
ORDER
On February 3, 2026, this Court dismissed this case and entered judgment. (Docs.
5-6). On February 5, 2026, Plaintiff filed a motion to reopen this case. (Doc. 9). The
motion fails to make a factual or legal argument. (Id.). As a result, it will be denied below.
Plaintiff has also filed 3 other documents that the Clerk’s office has classified as
notices notwithstanding the fact that Plaintiff called them motions. (Docs. 7,8, and 10).
These filings do not seek any relief and are properly filed as notices.
However, Doc. 8 has graphic sexual content that is irrelevant to this closed case.
The Court’s record cannot be used for a scandalous purpose. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(f).
Accordingly, the Court will strike and seal this document. Mr. White is cautioned that if
he again files scandalous materials, he will be barred from any future filings in this case.
Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that the motion to reopen (Doc. 9) is denied.
/ / /
/ / /
Case 2:26-cv-00548-JAT Document 11 Filed 02/18/26 Page 1 of 2
- 2 -
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Doc. 8 is stricken from the record. The Clerk
of the Court shall seal Doc. 8 after it is stricken.
Dated this 18th day of February, 2026.
Case 2:26-cv-00548-JAT Document 11 Filed 02/18/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.