2:26-cv-04291•Logan v. City of Mesa Police Department et al
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Robert Logan, Plaintiff, v. City of Mesa Police Department, et al., Defendants. No. CV-26-04291-PHX-KML ORDER On June 25, 2026, defendant City of Mesa answered plaintiff’s complaint. (Doc. 9.) On October 8, 2026, the City filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s state-law claims. The city identified its motion as brought “[p]ursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6).” (Doc. 25.) “A Rule 12(b)(6) motion must be made before the responsive pleading.” Elvig v. Calvin Presbyterian Church, 375 F.3d 951, 954 (9th Cir. 2004). The City’s motion is procedurally improper, and it is denied. The City may renew its arguments regarding plaintiff’s state-law claims in a motion for summary judgment after the conclusion of discovery. IT IS ORDERED the Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 25) is DENIED. Dated this 9th day of October, 2026. Case 2:26-cv-04291-KML Document 27 Filed 10/09/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.