(HC) Chapman v. Warden

2:25-cv-02125CaedOct 13, 2026

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JOSEPH ROBERT CHAPMAN,
Petitioner,
v.
WARDEN,
Respondent.
Case No. 2:25-cv-2125-DAD-JDP (P)
ORDER
On September 8, 2026, the district judge adopted my findings and recommendations and
dismissed claims two through eight in the operative petition as untimely. ECF No. 37. This
matter was referred back to me for additional proceedings. Id. Accordingly, within sixty days,
respondent shall address all remaining claims.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 13, 2026
JEREMY D. PETERSON
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case 2:25-cv-02125-DAD-JDP Document 38 Filed 10/13/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.