(PS) Legardy v. Sunrise Mall Owner Group et al

2:25-cv-02513CaedDec 8, 2025

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FLETCHER SHERMAN LEGARDY,
Plaintiff,
v.
SUNRISE MALL OWNER GROUP, et
al.,
Defendants.
No. 2:25-cv-2513 DJC AC PS
ORDER
Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed the above-entitled action. The matter was
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On October 9, 2025 the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations,
which were served on Plaintiff and which contained notice to Plaintiff that any
objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 21 days. (ECF
No. 5.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations,
although the Court has reviewed a Letter (ECF No. 6) filed by Plaintiff as well as a
Request for Ruling (ECF No. 7).
The Court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to
be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED that:
Case 2:25-cv-02513-DJC-AC Document 8 Filed 12/08/25 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1. The findings and recommendations filed October 9, 2025, are adopted in
full; and
2. This action is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and
for lack of federal jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1332(a); Fed. R. Civ. P.
41(b); Local Rule 110.
3. This Order resolves all pending motions, and the Clerk of Court is directed
to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: December 5, 2025
Hon. Daniel J. Calabretta
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Lega2513.800
Case 2:25-cv-02513-DJC-AC Document 8 Filed 12/08/25 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.