3:21-md-02996•In re: McKinsey & Co., Inc. National Prescription Opiate Consultant Litigation
In re: McKinsey & Co., Inc. National Prescription Opiate Consultant Litigation
3:21-md-02996CandJun 8, 2026
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Stephen P. New steve@newlawoffice.com STEPHEN NEW & ASSOCIATES 430 Harper Park Drive Beckley, West Virginia 25801 Telephone: (304) 250-6017 Counsel for Plaintiffs James L. Bernard (Pro Hac Vice) james.bernard@hoganlovells.com HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 390 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10017 Telephone: (212) 918-3000 Mark David McPherson (SBN 307951) mmcpherson@goodwinlaw.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP The New York Times Building 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Telephone: (212) 813-8800 Rebecca L. Tarneja (SBN 293461) rtarneja@goodwin.com GOODWIN PROCTER LLP 601 South Figueroa Street, Suite 4100 Los Angeles, CA 90017 Telephone: (213) 426-2500 Counsel for Defendant McKinsey & Company, Inc., United States UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA IN RE: MCKINSEY & CO., INC. NATIONAL PRESCRIPTION OPIATE CONSULTANT LITIGATION This document relates to: NAS ACTIONS Case No. 3:21-md-02996-CRB (SK) STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Judge: Hon. Charles R. Breyer Courtroom: 6, 17th Floor Case 3:21-md-02996-CRB Document 932 Filed 06/08/26 Page 1 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 2 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:21-MD-02996-CRB (SK) STIPULATION WHEREAS, on May 21, 2026, plaintiff Cynthia Woolwine (“Plaintiff”) filed a Motion for Sanctions For Spoliation of Evidence Against Defendant McKinsey & Company, Inc. (“Spoliation Motion”) (ECF 926); WHEREAS, due to scheduling issues for various McKinsey counsel, McKinsey seeks, and Plaintiffs do not oppose, twenty additional days to file its opposition to the Spoliation Motion (“Opposition”); NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby agree and stipulate that the deadline for McKinsey to submit its Opposition should be extended from June 4 to June 24, 2026. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: June 5, 2026 By: /s/ James L. Bernard James L. Bernard (Pro Hac Vice) james.bernard@hoganlovells.com HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP 390 Madison Avenue New York, NY 10017 Telephone: (212) 918-3000 GOODWIN PROCTER LLP Mark David McPherson (SBN 307951) mmcpherson@goodwinlaw.com The New York Times Building 620 Eighth Avenue New York, NY 10018 Telephone: (212) 813-8869 Counsel for Defendant McKinsey & Company, Inc., United States Case 3:21-md-02996-CRB Document 932 Filed 06/08/26 Page 2 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 3 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:21-MD-02996-CRB (SK) ATTESTATION Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that all signatories listed, and on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s content and have authorized the filing. By: /s/ Stephen P. New STEPHEN P. NEW steve@newlawoffice.com STEPHEN NEW & ASSOCIATES 430 Harper Park Drive Beckley, West Virginia 25801 Telephone: (304) 250-6017 Counsel for Plaintiffs By: /s/ James L. Bernard James L. Bernard HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP . Case 3:21-md-02996-CRB Document 932 Filed 06/08/26 Page 3 of 4
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 - 4 - STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CASE NO. 3:21-MD-02996-CRB (SK) STIPULATION ORDER Pursuant to stipulation, and for good cause show, IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: __________________ By: Charles R. Breyer UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE June 8, 2026 Case 3:21-md-02996-CRB Document 932 Filed 06/08/26 Page 4 of 4
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.