Netskope, Inc. v. Fortinet, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
NETSKOPE, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
FORTINET, INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 22-cv-01852-TLT (AGT)
ORDER RE: RESTRICTED ACCESS
TO ORDER ON MOTION TO STRIKE
Re: Dkt. No. 340
The Court has restricted public access to the order on Netskope’s motion to strike
Fortinet’s expert reports (dkt. 340) because the order contains or refers to material subject to
sealing orders. By June 4, 2026, the parties shall file either (1) a stipulated proposed redacted
version of the order, redacting only those portions of the order containing or referring to
material for which the Court has granted a motion to seal and which the parties still request
to be sealed, or (2) a stipulation that the parties agree that no redaction is necessary.
If the parties propose redactions, they shall also email a PDF copy of the proposed
redacted order, without any ECF headers, to agtpo@cand.uscourts.gov. The Court will re-
view the parties’ proposal and issue a redacted version of the order. If the parties stipulate
Case 3:22-cv-01852-TLT Document 341 Filed 05/28/26 Page 1 of 2

2
that no redaction is necessary, or if they fail to file a timely stipulation, the Court will allow
full public access to the unredacted order by removing the restrictions on Dkt. 340.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 28, 2026
______________________________
Alex G. Tse
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:22-cv-01852-TLT Document 341 Filed 05/28/26 Page 2 of 2