3:22-cv-07668•Hughes et al v. Apple, Inc.
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA LAUREN HUGHES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. APPLE, INC., Defendant. Case No. 22-cv-07668-VC (TSH) DISCOVERY ORDER Re: Dkt. No. 180 The parties have a discovery dispute about redactions Plaintiffs have made to their medical records. It’s difficult to evaluate Apple’s arguments, as they are presented in the abstract. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS the parties to meet and confer and to jointly submit 10 examples of redacted medical records (each side gets to pick five) and provide them and the related redaction logs to the Court for in camera review within five days. The parties shall lodge these documents with the Court in hard copy in one or more binders. The binder(s) shall clearly indicate which side picked which documents. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 21, 2025 THOMAS S. HIXSON United States Magistrate Judge Case 3:22-cv-07668-VC Document 185 Filed 10/21/25 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.