Little v. Pacific Seafood Procurement, LLC et al

3:23-cv-01098CandApr 29, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRAND LITTLE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PACIFIC SEAFOOD PROCUREMENT,
LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 23-cv-01098-AGT
DISCOVERY ORDER
Re: Dkt. Nos. 651, 653
For the same reasons articulated in a recent order in which the Court gave Pacific
Seafood leave to subpoena six crabbers whom Plaintiffs identified as the sources of certain
allegations made about Pacific Seafood (dkt. 693), the Court gives Ocean Gold and Ocean
King Fish leave to subpoena Patrick Davis, a crabber whom Plaintiffs identified as the source
of certain allegations made about Ocean Gold and Ocean King Fish.
To the extent that Davis believes the subpoenas are unduly burdensome or otherwise
improper, he may seek to quash or modify them after service. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 29, 2026
______________________________
Alex G. Tse
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:23-cv-01098-AGT Document 695 Filed 04/29/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.