3:23-cv-01098•Little v. Pacific Seafood Procurement, LLC et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRAND LITTLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PACIFIC SEAFOOD PROCUREMENT, LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No. 23-cv-01098-AGT ORDER RE: MOTIONS TO SEAL Re: Dkt. Nos. 685, 702 The Court denies the pending administrative motions to consider whether another party’s material should be sealed. Dkts. 685, 702. The designating parties didn’t file state- ments in support of sealing. Civil L.R. 79-5(f)(3). By May 21, 2026, the moving parties must file unredacted publicly available versions of the documents covered by the pending sealing motions. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: May 14, 2026 ______________________________ Alex G. Tse United States Magistrate Judge Case 3:23-cv-01098-AGT Document 708 Filed 05/14/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.