Little v. Pacific Seafood Procurement, LLC et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BRAND LITTLE, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
PACIFIC SEAFOOD PROCUREMENT,
LLC, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 23-cv-01098-AGT
ORDER RE: OZZIE GREGORIO’S
PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS
Re: Dkt. Nos. 680, 697
At this time, the Court will not require third-party Ozzie Gregorio “to appear in Court
to answer questions under oath . . . so [Defendants] can assess whether responsive documents
and information do not exist or have been wrongfully withheld . . . .” Dkt. 680 at 8.
If Defendants are concerned that Gregorio’s production is incomplete, they can no-
tice his deposition. If the deposition reveals that Gregorio has withheld documents, the Court
may allow Defendants to continue the deposition after further productions. If Gregorio im-
pedes or frustrates the deposition, as Defendants worry he may do, the Court will address
his conduct. But Defendants’ concerns about how a deposition will go don’t justify skipping
the deposition altogether and replacing it with an in-court proceeding.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 29, 2026
______________________________
Alex G. Tse
United States Magistrate Judge
Case 3:23-cv-01098-AGT Document 724 Filed 05/29/26 Page 1 of 1