3:23-cv-01098•Little v. Pacific Seafood Procurement, LLC et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA BRAND LITTLE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. PACIFIC SEAFOOD PROCUREMENT, LLC, et al., Defendants. Case No. 23-cv-01098-AGT ORDER ON MOTION TO SEAL Re: Dkt. No. 741 The Court denies the administrative motion to consider whether another party’s ma- terial should be sealed. Dkt. 741. The designating party didn’t file a statement in support of sealing. Civil L.R. 79-5(f)(3). By July 29, 2026, the moving parties must file unredacted publicly available versions of the documents covered by the sealing motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 22, 2026 ______________________________ Alex G. Tse United States Magistrate Judge Case 3:23-cv-01098-AGT Document 784 Filed 07/22/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.