3:23-cv-04416•Sanders v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Full text
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEPHEN (REX) SANDERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Defendant. Case No. 23-cv-04416-RFL SECOND PROPOSED FINAL JURY INSTRUCTIONS AND RULINGS ON DISPUTED JURY INSTRUCTIONS Enclosed as Exhibits A and B are the Court’s second proposed final jury instructions and rulings on the parties’ disputed jury instructions following the conference on February 18, 2026. For the reasons provided in the attached rulings and articulated on the record on February 18, Defendant’s proposed amendments to the jury instructions in Dkt. Nos. 297 and 299 are denied. Plaintiffs have enumerated specific protected activities and adverse actions in their proposed instructions and have proffered additional protected activities and adverse actions (see Dkt. Nos. 293, 298). The Court reserves its ruling as to the final list of protected activities and adverse actions for the final charging conference. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 19, 2026 RITA F. LIN United States District Judge Case 3:23-cv-04416-RFL Document 310 Filed 02/19/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.