3:23-cv-04416•Sanders v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District
Full text
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA STEPHEN (REX) SANDERS, et al., Plaintiffs, v. BAY AREA AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, Defendant. Case No. 23-cv-04416-RFL RULINGS REGARDING INDIVIDUAL EXHIBITS FROM ILLUMYX DEPOSITIONS Attached as Exhibit A are the Court’s rulings regarding Defendant’s hearsay objections to certain exhibits from the Illumyx depositions (Trial Exhibits 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50), which were raised on March 2, 2026. The attached rulings explain why the Air District’s hearsay objections have been overruled, and supplement the explanation and limiting instructions provided on February 27 and March 2. The Court’s rulings on the Air District’s other objections, including under Federal Rule of Evidence 403, were separately addressed on the record on February 27 and March 2 and are not repeated in the attached chart. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 3, 2026 RITA F. LIN United States District Judge Case 3:23-cv-04416-RFL Document 331 Filed 03/03/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.