DOE KG 039 v. Uber Technologies, Inc et al

3:25-cv-06077CandJan 9, 2026

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
IN RE: UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.,
PASSENGER SEXUAL ASSAULT
LITIGATION
_________________________________/
This Order Relates To:
C.O. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.,
Case No. 3:25-cv-02551-CRB
I.C. v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.,
Case No. 3:25-cv-06382-CRB
Jessi Watt v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et
al., Case No. 3:25-cv-04704-CRB
Jane Doe 690917 v. Uber Technologies,
Inc., et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-05318-CRB
Jane Doe KG 013 v. Uber Technologies,
Inc., et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-05577-CRB
Jane Doe KG 016 v. Uber Technologies,
Inc., et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-05582-CRB
Jane Doe KG 039 v. Uber Technologies,
Inc., et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-06077-CRB
Jane Doe 691174 v. Uber Technologies,
Inc., et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-04582-CRB
John Doe 692195 v. Uber Technologies,
Inc., et al., Case No. 3:25-cv-03421-CRB
MDL No. 3084
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO
WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
Re: Dkt. No. 4432, 4446, 4573, 4582,
4583, 4584, 4585, 4586, 4697, 4698,
4699
Case 3:25-cv-06077-CRB Document 6 Filed 01/09/26 Page 1 of 2
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
Jane Doe KGDB 016 v. Uber
Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:25-
cv-04337-CRB
John Doe KGDB 018 v. Uber
Technologies, Inc., et al., Case No. 3:25-
cv-04355-CRB
The Motions to Withdraw as Counsel in the above-captioned cases are denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 9, 2026
CHARLES R. BREYER
United States District Judge
Case 3:25-cv-06077-CRB Document 6 Filed 01/09/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.