Hurley et al v. 2121 Sacramento Street Owner, L.P. et al

3:26-cv-08044CandOct 15, 2026

Full text

Form ADR-Stip rev. 1-15-2019
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff(s)
v.
Defendant(s)
CASE No C
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the following
stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5. The parties agree to participate in the
following ADR process:
 	Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
 	Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
 	Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge (ADR L.R. 7)
 	Private ADR (specify process and provider)
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
 	the presumptive deadline (90 days from the date of the order referring the case to ADR)
 	other requested deadline:
Date:
Date:
Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant
 IT IS SO ORDERED.
 IT IS SO ORDERED WITH THE FOLLOWING MODIFICATIONS:
DATE:
U.S. DISTRICT/MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Important! E-file this form in ECF using the appropriate event among these choices: “Stipulation & Proposed Order
Selecting Mediation” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting ENE” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Early
Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge” or “Stipulation & Proposed Order Selecting Private ADR.”
Maura Hurley, et al.,
2121 Sacramento Street Owner, L.P., et al.,
3:26-cv-08044-LJC
n
n
10/14/2026
10/14/2026
CRB
October 15, 2026
XX
Case 3:26-cv-08044-CRB Document 30 Filed 10/15/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.