4:13-cr-00818•USA v. Ellis et al
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 United States District Court Northern District of California UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DAMIEN EDWARD MCDANIEL, Defendant. Case No. 13-cr-00818-PJH-3 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Re: Dkt. No. 616, 617, 618 Defendant in the above-captioned case has filed a pro se motion for reduction of sentence. See Dkt. 616. Following the motion, the court issued an order setting a briefing schedule. See Dkt. 617. The government was directed to file an opposition or status report by August 28, 2026. See id. The August 28 deadline came and went without any filing by the government. Defendant filed a letter noting that the government did not file an opposition, and asking that his motion be granted. See Dkt. 618. The court hereby ORDERS the government to SHOW CAUSE as to why defendant’s motion for reduction of sentence should not be granted. The government shall have until October 16, 2026 to file a response. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 2, 2026 /s/ Phyllis J. Hamilton PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON United States District Judge Case 4:13-cr-00818-PJH Document 619 Filed 10/02/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.