Axelrod et al v. Lenovo (United States) Inc.

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ANDREW AXELROD, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC.,
Defendant.
Case No. 21-cv-06770-JSW
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS TO
SEAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Re: Dkt. Nos. 391, 402
Plaintiffs moved to file portions of their opposition to Defendant’s motion to enforce the
scheduling order under seal. Defendant filed a statement relating to that motion. Plaintiffs filed a
response to Defendant’s statement and moved to seal portions of that response. The parties also
filed motions to seal relating to Plaintiff’s motion for sanctions, which is pending before
Magistrate Judge Illman. The Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE the motions to seal filed
in connection with the motion to enforce the scheduling order. All materials submitted under seal
shall remain conditionally sealed. No later than one week after Judge Illman rules on the motion
for sanctions and attendant motions to seal, Plaintiffs and Defendant shall meet and confer and
submit a joint motion to seal the briefs and exhibits relating to Defendant’s motion to enforce the
scheduling order. If the parties disagree on what materials should be sealed, they shall set forth
their respective positions in that joint motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 26, 2026
______________________________________
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge
Case 4:21-cv-06770-JSW Document 411 Filed 05/26/26 Page 1 of 1