4:22-md-03047•IN RE: SOCIAL MEDIA ADOLESCENT ADDICTION/PERSONAL INJURY PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
IN RE: SOCIAL MEDIA ADOLESCENT ADDICTION/PERSONAL INJURY PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
4:22-md-03047CandDec 8, 2025
Full text
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON OMNIBUS STIPULATION REGARDING SEALING JOINT LETTER BRIEF REGARDING WHETHER CERTAIN META DOCUMENTS ARE PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE 4:22-md-03047-YGR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION IN RE: SOCIAL MEDIA ADOLESCENT ADDICTION/PERSONAL INJURY PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION This Document Relates To: ALL ACTIONS MDL No. 3047 Case No.: 4:22-md-03047-YGR [PROPOSED] ORDER ON OMNIBUS STIPULATION REGARDING SEALING JOINT LETTER BRIEF REGARDING WHETHER CERTAIN META DOCUMENTS ARE PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE Judge: Hon. Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers Magistrate Judge: Hon. Peter H. Kang Case 4:22-md-03047-YGR Document 2526 Filed 12/08/25 Page 1 of 3
2 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON OMNIBUS STIPULATION REGARDING SEALING JOINT LETTER BRIEF REGARDING WHETHER CERTAIN META DOCUMENTS ARE PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE 4:22-md-03047-YGR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 79-5 and the Court’s Order Setting Sealing Procedures (Dkt. 341), the Court rules as follows on the Omnibus Stipulation to Seal in connection with the Parties’ Joint Letter Brief Regarding Whether Certain Meta Documents are Protected by Attorney-Client Privilege (Dkt. 2474) and Meta’s administrative motion to file under seal (Dkt. 247): Filing Portion to be Sealed Action To Be Taken Court’s Order Joint Letter Brief Regarding Whether Certain Meta Documents Are Protected by Attorney-Client Privilege (ECF No. 2475-1) Employee Name Redact specified portion Exhibit A, a document produced in this litigation by the Meta Defendants beginning with the Bates number META3047MDL- 034-00504889 (ECF No. 2475-2) Employee Name and Identifying Information Redact specified portion Exhibit B, Transcript of February 6, 2025 Deposition of Meta witness (ECF No. 2475-3) Employee Name Redact specified portion Exhibit G, Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Production of Unredacted Documents, filed in Social Media Cases, No. JCCP 5255 (Cal. Super. Ct.) (ECF No. 2475-8) Employee Name Redact specified portion Exhibit H, a document produced in this litigation by the Meta Defendants beginning with the Employee Name and Identifying Information Redact specified portion GRANTED GRANTED GRANTED GRANTED GRANTED Case 4:22-md-03047-YGR Document 2526 Filed 12/08/25 Page 2 of 3
3 [PROPOSED] ORDER ON OMNIBUS STIPULATION REGARDING SEALING JOINT LETTER BRIEF REGARDING WHETHER CERTAIN META DOCUMENTS ARE PROTECTED BY ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE 4:22-md-03047-YGR 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Bates number META3047MDL- 004-00015029 (ECF No. 2475-9) Exhibit I, Transcript of November 19, 2025 Deposition of Meta witness (ECF No. 2475-11) Employee Name Redact specified portion Exhibit J, a document produced in this litigation by the Meta Defendants beginning with the Bates number META3047MDL- 031-00242456 (ECF No. 2475-13) Employee Name and Identifying Information Redact specified portion SO ORDERED. DATED: _____________________________________ Hon. Peter H. Kang United States Magistrate Judge December 8, 2025 GRANTED GRANTED Case 4:22-md-03047-YGR Document 2526 Filed 12/08/25 Page 3 of 3
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.