Arrellano et al v. Sonoma County et al

4:23-cv-00187CandMay 28, 2026

Full text

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United
 States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FRANCISCO ARRELLANO, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
v.
DEENA MISTRY,
Defendant.
Case No. 23-cv-00187-ASK
JUDGMENT
Re: Dkt. Nos. 115, 116
On May 12, 2026, the Court granted Defendant Mistry’s unopposed motion for summary
judgment of Plaintiff Arrellano’s claims. Dkt. 115. On May 2 , 2026, the Court granted Defendant
Mistry’s unopposed motion for summary judgment of minor Plaintiff S.A.’s claims. Dkt. 116.
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court hereby ENTERS JUDGMENT
in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiffs. The Clerk of the Court shall terminate the case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 28, 2026
AJAY KRISHNAN
United States Magistrate Judge
8
Case 4:23-cv-00187-ASK Document 117 Filed 05/28/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.