4:23-cv-01379•Rodriguez v. Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- JT. STIP. RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING Manny Starr (319778) Manny@frontierlawcenter.com Frontier Law Center 23901 Calabasas Road, #2074 Calabasas, CA 91302 Telephone: (818) 914-3433 Facsimile: (818) 914-3433 CHURCH STATE COUNCIL Alan J. Reinach, Esq. SBN. 196899 Jonathon S. Cherne, SBN. 281548 2686 Townsgate Road, Westlake Village, CA 91359 Tel. 805.413-7398 Fax: 805.497-3828 E-mail: ajreinach@churchstate.org Jcherne@churchstate.org Attorneys for Plaintiff MARINO JAIR RODRIGUEZ, et al UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MARINO JAIR RODRIGUEZ, an individual; JENNIFER NORRIS MENA, an individual; WILLIAM KENNEDY, an individual; ANNE MARIE RUIZ, an individual; ROBERT RICHARD BIRCHER, an individual; CHRISTOPHER MICHAEL SACIL, an individual; ELIZABETH ALVAREZ SANCHEZ, an individual; JAMES MATTHEW BUCKLEY, an individual; JOHN DAVID ROLLAND, an individual; MARTA MAHEALANI SACIL, an individual; MICHAEL EDWARD POYTHRESS, an individual; and TERRENCE DARBY, an individual Plaintiff(s), v. SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY; and SHAW HR CONSULTING, INC.; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Defendants. CASE NO. 23-cv-01379-HSG JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFS FOR THE CROSS MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER [Complaint Filed: November 14, 2022] Trial Date: The remaining Plaintiffs in this action, Marino Jair Rodriguez, Jennifer Norris Mena, William Kennedy, Robert Richard Bircher, Michael Edward Poythress, John David Rolland, and Case 4:23-cv-01379-HSG Document 142 Filed 02/19/26 Page 1 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2- JT. STIP. RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING Elizabeth Alvarez Sanchez and Defendant Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority (collectively the “Parties”) hereby stipulate and request as follows: 1. The Parties have met and conferred as required by the Court’s Order following the further Case Management Conference held on February 17, 2026 (Dkt. 140). 2. The Parties’ stipulate that the Opening Supplemental Briefs in support of their respective summary judgment motions shall be filed by 5:00 PM on February 24, 2026. The Opening Briefs shall be no more than ten pages in length. 3. The Parties’ stipulate that the Oppositions to the respective supplemental summary judgment briefs shall be filed on or before February 27, 2026. The Opposition Briefs shall be no more than ten pages in length. Respectfully submitted, Dated: February 19, 2026 FRONTIER LAW CENTER CHURCH STATE COUNCIL By: ALAN J REINACH JONATHON CHERNE MANNY M. STARR Attorneys for Plaintiffs MARINO JAIR RODRIGUEZ, et al Dated: February 19, 2026 ATKINSON, ANDELSON, LOYA, RUUD & ROMO By: RUTH M. BOND Attorneys for Defendant SANTA CLARA VALLEY TRANSPORTATION AUTHORITY /s/ Jonathon Cherne /s/ Ruth Bond Case 4:23-cv-01379-HSG Document 142 Filed 02/19/26 Page 2 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3- JT. STIP. RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING ORDER ON PARTIES’ STIPULATION The Court has reviewed the Parties’ Stipulation and the Court hereby adopts the briefing schedule proposed by the parties: The Parties’ Opening Supplemental Briefs in support of their respective summary judgment motions shall be filed by 5:00 PM on February 24, 2026. The Opening Briefs shall be no more than ten pages in length. The Parties’ Oppositions to the respective supplemental summary judgment briefs shall be filed on or before February 27, 2026. The Opposition Briefs shall be no more than ten pages in length. IT IS SO ORDERED: Dated: HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. 2/19/2026 Case 4:23-cv-01379-HSG Document 142 Filed 02/19/26 Page 3 of 3
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.