4:25-cv-09900•Kaiser et al v. The Progressive Corporation et al
Full text
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANIEL KAISER AND LOGAN KERWIN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. The Progressive Corporation, Blue Hill Specialty Insurance Company Inc., and DOES 1-100, Defendants, CASE NO. 4:25-cv-09900-HSG ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION EXTENDING TIME FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSE TO COMPLAINT [Filed concurrently with Stipulation Extending Time for Defendants’ Response to Complaint; and Declaration of Kymberly Kochis] Case 4:25-cv-09900-HSG Document 15 Filed 12/15/25 Page 1 of 2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- ORDER NOW, THEREFORE, having reviewed the parties’ Stipulation Extending Time for Defendants’ Response to Complaint, the Court ORDERS that: 1. Defendants shall have until February 10, 2026, to file their responsive pleading; 2. Plaintiffs shall have until March 10, 2026, to file an opposition; 3. Defendants shall have until March 27, 2026, to file a reply. PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 12/15/2025 _________________________________ HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 4:25-cv-09900-HSG Document 15 Filed 12/15/25 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.