McGehee v. Arsalane et al

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
United States District Court
Northern District of California
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ROBERT JAMES MCGEHEE,
Plaintiff,
v.
ARSALANE, et al.,
Defendants.
Case No. 26-cv-06598-JST
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Plaintiff has filed a pro se civil rights action. On August 3, 2026, the Court’s July 17,
2026 Order Granting Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis was returned to the Court as
undeliverable with the notation that Plaintiff was no longer in custody. ECF No. 4. N.D. Cal.
Civil L.R. 3-11 provides that the Court may dismiss a complaint without prejudice when: (1) court
mail addressed to the pro se party has been returned to the court as not deliverable, and (2) the
Court fails to receive within 60 days of this return a written communication from the pro se party
indicating a current address. See N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 3-11(b). More than sixty days has passed
since court mail addressed to Plaintiff was returned as undeliverable. Accordingly, the Court
DISMISSES this case without prejudice pursuant to N.D. Cal. Civil L.R. 3-11. Because the
dismissal is without prejudice, Plaintiff may move to reopen this case. Judgment is entered in
favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff. The Clerk shall close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 14, 2026
______________________________________
JON S. TIGAR
United States District Judge
Case 4:26-cv-06598-JST Document 5 Filed 10/14/26 Page 1 of 1