5:26-cr-00048•USA v. Lucero-Peace et al
Full text
1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CRAIG H. MISSAKIAN (CABN 125202) United States Attorney JEFF MITCHELL (CABN 236225) Chief, Criminal Division NEAL C. HONG (ILBN 6309265) Assistant United States Attorney 60 S. Market, Suite 1200 San Jose, California 95113 Telephone: (408) 535-5081 neal.hong@usdoj.gov Attorneys for United States of America UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JONATHAN LUCERO PEACE, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 26-CR-00048-1 EKL STIPULATION TO CONTINUE STATUS HEARING AND EXCLUDE TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Currently, there is a status conference scheduled for April 7, 2026. Counsel for Defendant is reviewing discovery. Counsel for Defendant requires additional time to review certain matters to effectively prepare Defendant’s case. Accordingly, the parties respectfully request that the Court continue the status conference scheduled for April 7, 2026, to May 26, 2026. The parties stipulate and agree that excluding time until March 26, 2026, will allow for the effective preparation and continuity of counsel. See 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The parties further stipulate and agree that the ends of justice served by excluding the time from April 7, 2026, to May 26, 2026, from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and Defendant in a speedy trial. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(iv). Case 5:26-cr-00048-EKL Document 42 Filed 04/03/26 Page 1 of 3
2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO STIPULATED CRAIG H. MISSAKIAN United States Attorney Dated: April 2, 2026 /s/ Neal Hong________________ NEAL C. HONG Assistant United States Attorney /s/ Naomi Chung_________________ NAOMI CHUNG Counsel for Defendant Case 5:26-cr-00048-EKL Document 42 Filed 04/03/26 Page 2 of 3
3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, and for good cause shown, the Court hereby continues the status conference to May 26, 2026, and excludes time under the Speedy Trial Act from April 7, 2026, to May 26, 2026. The Court finds that failing to exclude the time from April 7, 2026, to May 26, 2026, would unreasonably deny defense counsel and the defendant the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv). The Court further finds that the ends of justice served by excluding the time from April 7, 2026, to May 26, 2026, from computation under the Speedy Trial Act outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. Therefore, and with the consent of the parties, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the time from April 7, 2026, to May 26, 2026, shall be excluded from computation under the Speedy Trial Act. 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A), (B)(iv). IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ___________________ HON. EUMI K. LEE United States District Judge April 3, 2026 Case 5:26-cr-00048-EKL Document 42 Filed 04/03/26 Page 3 of 3
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.