VirtaMove, Corp. v. Google LLC

Case No. 5:25-cv-00860-NW
STIPULATION REGARDING CONSOLIDATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Marc Fenster (SBN 181067)
mfenster@raklaw.com
Reza Mirzaie (SBN 246953)
rmirzaie@raklaw.com
Neil A. Rubin (SBN 250761)
nrubin@raklaw.com
Jacob Buczko (SBN 269408)
jbuczko@raklaw.com
James A. Milkey (SBN 281283)
jmilkey@raklaw.com
James Tseui (SBN 285530)
jtseui@raklaw.com
Christian Conkle (SBN 306374)
cconkle@raklaw.com
Qi (Peter) Tong (SBN 300347)
ptong@raklaw.com
Jonathan Ma (SBN 312773)
jma@raklaw.com
Daniel Kolko (SBN 341680)
dkolko@raklaw.com
RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90025
Telephone: (310) 826-7474
Facsimile: (310) 826-9226
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
VirtaMove Corp.
David A. Perlson (CA SBN 209502)
david.perlson@hoganlovells.com
Antonio Sistos (CA SBN 238847)
ton.sistos@hoganlovells.com
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Hogan Lovells US LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3500
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 374-2412
Deepa Acharya (CA SBN 267654)
deepaacharya@quinnemanuel.com
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
1300 I Street NW, Suite 900
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Washington, District of Columbia 20005-
3314
Telephone: (202) 538-8000
Fax: (202) 538-8100
Attorneys for Defendant,
Google, LLC
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE, LLC
Defendant.
Case No. 5:25-cv-00860-NW
Jury Trial Demanded
Judge:
Location:
Hon. Noël Wise
Courtroom 3, 5th Floor
Case 5:26-cv-00704-NW Document 47 Filed 04/17/26 Page 1 of 7

1 Case No. 5:25-cv-00860-NW
STIPULATION REGARDING CONSOLIDATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
VIRTAMOVE, CORP.,
Plaintiff,
v.
GOOGLE, LLC
Defendant.
Case No. 5:26-cv-00704-NW
Jury Trial Demanded
Judge:
Location:
Hon. Noël Wise
Courtroom 3, 5th Floor
STIPULATION REGARDING CONSOLIDATION
Case 5:26-cv-00704-NW Document 47 Filed 04/17/26 Page 2 of 7

1
Case No. 5:25-cv-00860-NW
STIPULATION REGARDING CONSOLIDATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree that
1. VirtaMove II should be consolidated into VirtaMove I for all purposes. The
Plaintiff VirtaMove, Corp. (“VirtaMove”) and Defendant Google LLC (“Google”)
(collectively, the “Parties”), hereby submit the following Joint Stipulation, as follows:
WHEREAS, the Court has related the instant case (“VirtaMove I”) and Case No. 5:26-CV-
00704 (“VirtaMove II”). Dkt. 137.
WHEREAS, the Court issued substantially similar Case Management and Trial Setting
Orders in VirtaMove I (Dkt. 141) and VirtaMove II (Dkt. 37), including setting both cases for the
same trial date and for the same claim construction hearing.
WHEREAS, U.S. Pat. No, 7,519,814 (the “’814 patent”) at issue in VirtaMove I and Pat.
7,774,762 (the “’762 patent”) at issue in VirtaMove II are members of the same patent family, and
the ’762 patent claims priority to the ’814 patent.
WHEREAS, VirtaMove accuses overlapping Google products of infringing both the ’814
patent in VirtaMove I and the ’762 patent in VirtaMove II.
WHEREAS, VirtaMove I and VirtaMove II involve many of the same documents and
witnesses.
WHEREAS, the parties agree that VirtaMove I and VirtaMove II should be consolidated
for all purposes as if VirtaMove filed a single complaint and should result in a single judgment.
WHEREAS, the parties in VirtaMove I agreed to the following discovery limits consistent
with the WDTX Midland Division Order Governing Proceedings: 30 Interrogatories per side, 45
requests for admission, 75 requests for production, 70 hours of fact depositions, and 7 hours of
expert deposition per expert report.
WHEREAS, the parties agree to modify the VirtaMove I discovery limits for a consolidated
VirtaMove I and VirtaMove II.
Case 5:26-cv-00704-NW Document 47 Filed 04/17/26 Page 3 of 7

2 Case No. 5:25-cv-00860-NW
STIPULATION REGARDING CONSOLIDATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
complaints in both VirtaMove I and VirtaMove II shall be treated as a single civil
action that will be subject to a single final judgment. All filings made in VirtaMove
II shall be treated as though also filed in VirtaMove I.
2. All future filings by the parties shall use a caption that includes the case number for
VirtaMove I.
3. VirtaMove II shall be administratively closed in view of the consolidation. The
administrative closing of VirtaMove II is not a ruling on the merits and does not
count as a dismissal of the VirtaMove II complaint.
4. The following discovery limits should be applied for the consolidated case:
a. Each party should be allowed 35 interrogatories.
b. Each party should be allowed 50 requests for admission.
c. Each party should be allowed 85 requests for production.
d. Each party should be allowed 80 hours of fact depositions. A deposition of
three hours or less will be counted as three hours against these time limits.
5. Nothing herein shall preclude any party from seeking leave to extend page limits in
the consolidated case to account for its scope of multiple patents.
Jointly submitted on April 15, 2026.
/s/ Peter Tong
Marc Fenster (SBN 181067)
Email: mfenster@raklaw.com
Reza Mirzaie (SBN 246953)
rmirzaie@raklaw.com
Neil A. Rubin (SBN 250761)
nrubin@raklaw.com
Jacob Buczko (SBN 269408)
jbuczko@raklaw.com
James A. Milkey (SBN 281283)
jmilkey@raklaw.com
James Tseui (SBN 285530)
/s/ David Perlson
David A. Perlson (CA SBN 209502)
david.perlson@hoganlovells.com
Antonio Sistos (CA SBN 238847)
ton.sistos@hoganlovells.com
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Hogan Lovells US LLP
4 Embarcadero Center, Suite 3500
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: (415) 374-2412
Deepa Acharya (CA SBN 267654)
deepaacharya@quinnemanuel.com
Case 5:26-cv-00704-NW Document 47 Filed 04/17/26 Page 4 of 7

3 Case No. 5:25-cv-00860-NW
STIPULATION REGARDING CONSOLIDATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
jtseui@raklaw.com
Christian Conkle (SBN 306374)
cconkle@raklaw.com
Qi (Peter) Tong (SBN 300347)
ptong@raklaw.com
Jonathan Ma (SBN 312773)
jma@raklaw.com
Daniel Kolko (SBN 341680)
dkolko@raklaw.com
RUSS AUGUST & KABAT
12424 Wilshire Boulevard, 12th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90025
Telephone: (310) 826-7474
Facsimile: (310) 826-9226
Attorneys for Plaintiff, VirtaMove Corp.
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART &
SULLIVAN, LLP
1300 I Street NW, Suite 900
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan, LLP
Washington, District of Columbia 20005-
3314
Telephone: (202) 538-8000
Fax: (202) 538-8100
Attorneys for Google Defendant Google, LLC
Case 5:26-cv-00704-NW Document 47 Filed 04/17/26 Page 5 of 7

1
Case No. 5:25-cv-00860-NW
STIPULATION REGARDING CONSOLIDATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
FILER’S ATTESTATION
I attest in compliance with Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3) that all other signatories listed, and
on whose behalf the filing is submitted, concur in the filing’s consent and have authorized the
filing.
Dated: April 15, 2026 /s/ Peter Tong
Case 5:26-cv-00704-NW Document 47 Filed 04/17/26 Page 6 of 7

2 Case No. 5:25-cv-00860-NW
STIPULATION REGARDING CONSOLIDATION
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Plaintiff VirtaMove, Corp. and Defendant Google LLC have stipulated to the consolidation
of VirtaMove Corp. v. Google LLC, Case No. 5:25-cv-00860 with VirtaMove Corp. v. Google
LLC, Case No. 5:26-CV-00704. See Dkt. ______.
PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES’ STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: _____________________, 2026
______________________________
Honorable Noël Wise
United States District Judge
April 17
Case 5:26-cv-00704-NW Document 47 Filed 04/17/26 Page 7 of 7