5:24-cv-00274•TAYLOR v. RHODES
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION CARL TAYLOR, JR., Plaintiff, v. Case No.: 5:24cv274-MW/MJF TERRY L. RHODES, Defendant. _________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION This Court has considered, without hearing, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, ECF No. 25, and has also reviewed de novo Plaintiff’s objections, ECF No. 26. Plaintiff’s objections state in conclusory fashion that he followed Rule 4(e) and mailed a copy of the summons and complaint to Defendant. However, as the Magistrate Judge notes, Plaintiff has not demonstrated how this constitutes effective service, nor has he met his burden to demonstrate that this satisfies the rules. Finally, Plaintiff’s objections note that “if no objection I ask for a[n] appeal.” ECF No. 26 at 1. Inasmuch as this Court construes Plaintiff’s filing, ECF No. 26, as objections to the report and recommendation, they are not also treated as an appeal Case 5:24-cv-00274-MW-MJF Document 27 Filed 02/25/26 Page 1 of 2
2 as no appealable order has yet been entered. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED: The report and recommendation, ECF No. 25, is accepted and adopted, over the Plaintiff’s objections, as this Court’s opinion. The Clerk shall enter judgment stating, “Plaintiff’s action is DISMISSED without prejudice.” The Clerk shall close the file. SO ORDERED on February 25, 2026. s/Mark E. Walker ____ United States District Judge Case 5:24-cv-00274-MW-MJF Document 27 Filed 02/25/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.