CHARLESTON v. DIXON

5:25-cv-00332FlndJan 5, 2026

Full text

Page 1 of 2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
PANAMA CITY DIVISION
DERRICK CHARLESTON,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 5:25-cv-332-TKW-MJF
RICKY DIXON,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and
Recommendation (Doc. 5). No objections were filed.
Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the entire
case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case
should be dismissed because the complaint fails to state a plausible claim for relief
under 42 U.S.C. §1983. Accordingly, it is
ORDERED that:
1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and
incorporated by reference in this Order.
2. This case is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C. §1915A(b)(1) for failure to
state a claim on which relief may be granted.
Case 5:25-cv-00332-TKW-MJF Document 6 Filed 01/05/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2
3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close
the case file.
DONE AND ORDERED this 5th day of January, 2026.
__________________________________
T. KENT WETHERELL, II
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case 5:25-cv-00332-TKW-MJF Document 6 Filed 01/05/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.