5:25-cv-00365•GUTMANN-CROWN v. GUTMANN
Full text
Page 1 of 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA PANAMA CITY DIVISION CLARICE MACHIA GUTMANN-CROWN, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 5:25-cv-365-TKW-MJF STEPHEN FRANCIS GUTMANN, et al., Defendants. / ORDER This case is before the Court based on the magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 14). No objections were filed. Upon due consideration of the Report and Recommendation and the case file, the Court agrees with the magistrate judge’s determination that this case should be dismissed because the second amended complaint is a shotgun pleading. It also violates the local rules because it is not on court-mandated complaint form. See N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.7(A). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that: 1. The magistrate judge’s Report and Recommendation is adopted and incorporated by reference in this Order. Case 5:25-cv-00365-TKW-MJF Document 15 Filed 06/15/26 Page 1 of 2
Page 2 of 2 2. This case is DISMISSED because the second amended complaint is a shotgun pleading and is not on the required complaint form. 3. The Clerk shall enter judgment in accordance with this Order and close the case file. DONE AND ORDERED this 15th day of June, 2026. __________________________________ T. KENT WETHERELL, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case 5:25-cv-00365-TKW-MJF Document 15 Filed 06/15/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.