Matus v. Sport Squad, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
CASE NO. 0:24-cv-60954-LEIBOWITZ/AUGUSTIN-BIRCH
GREG MATUS,
on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
SPORT SQUAD, INC.,
et al.,
Defendants.
_____________________________________/
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon the Report and Recommendation on Motion for
Final Approval of Class Settlement and Application for Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [ECF No. 66],
submitted on March 2, 2026, in which United States Magistrate Judge Panayotta Augustin-Birch
recommends GRANTING the Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement and Application for
Attorneys’ Fees and Costs [ECF No. 62] (the “Motion”) and APPROVING the parties’ settlement
agreement. The undersigned previously referred the parties’ Motion to Magistrate Judge Augustin-
Birch for a report and recommendation, consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Rule 72 of the
Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and Rule 1(d) of the Local Magistrate Judge Rules. [ECF No. 63].
Since the Report and Recommendation was filed on March 2, 2026, no objections were filed during
the 14-day objection period.
Thus, having reviewed the Motion, the record, the Report and Recommendation, the
governing law and finding no error, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that:
1. 	The Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 66] is AFFIRMED and
ADOPTED.
2. 	The Motion for Final Approval of Class Settlement and Application for Attorneys’ Fees and
Case 0:24-cv-60954-DSL Document 67 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2026 Page 1 of 2

Costs [ECF No. 62] is GRANTED.
3. 	The parties’ settlement agreement [ECF No. 55-1] is APPROVED.
4. 	This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
5. 	Any pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT.
6. 	The Court retains jurisdiction for the sole purpose of enforcing the parties’ settlement
agreement.
7. 	The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.
DONE AND ORDERED in the Southern District of Florida on March 19, 2026.
cc: 	counsel of record
Case 0:24-cv-60954-DSL Document 67 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/19/2026 Page 2 of 2