WILLIAMS v. JIMENEZ et al

7:26-cv-00002GamdMar 24, 2026

Full text

1
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION
LUCAS WILLIAMS, 	:
:
Plaintiff, 	:
:
v. 	: 	CASE NO.: 7:26-CV-00002 (WLS)
:
SERGIO JIMENEZ, et al., 	:
:
Defendants. 	:
:
ORDER
Previously, on January 9, 2026, the Court entered an Order (Doc. 3) granting Plaintiff’s
Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 2). In conducting a review of Plaintiff’s
complaint, as required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court concluded that it lacked sufficient
allegations from which the Court could determine whether Plaintiff’s case is properly filed in
this Court. The complaint also does not include any specific factual allegation or claims against
any of the named Defendants. As such, the Court ordered Plaintiff to recast his complaint by
no later than Friday, January 30, 2026. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the
Court’s instructions could result in the dismissal of his case. To date, Plaintiff has not filed a
recast complaint, and the deadline set forth in the Court’s previous Order (Doc. 3) has expired.
The Court will allow Plaintiff one final opportunity to comply with the Court’s Order
by recasting his complaint. Plaintiff must pay the fee or file the IFP Application within
twenty-one (21) days of the entry of this Order, or by no later than Tuesday, April 14,
2026. Plaintiff is once again NOTICED that failure to timely comply with this Order will
result in his case being dismissed without further notice or proceedings.
SO ORDERED, this 24th day of March 2026.
/s/ W. Louis Sands
W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Case 7:26-cv-00002-WLS Document 4 Filed 03/24/26 Page 1 of 1

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.