7:26-cv-00005•MCLEOD v. SMITH et al
Full text
1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION RICHARD JERRY McLEOD, Plaintiff, v. CATHERINE SMITH, et al., Defendants. ____________________________________ : : : : : : : : CASE NO: 7:26-cv-05–WLS ORDER Presently before the Court is the pro se Plaintiff’s Motion for Dismissal without Prejudice (Doc. 13), as amended by Plaintiff’s Amendment to His Previously Filed Notice of Voluntary Dismissal of the Above-Captioned Order Without the Necessity of a Court Order (Doc. 15) (together with Doc. 13, the “Notice”). Pursuant to the Notice, under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i),1 Plaintiff dismisses, without prejudice, all claims against all Defendants, none of whom have served an answer or motion for summary judgment in this action. For the purpose of completing the record, the Court acknowledges and CONFIRMS Plaintiff’s Notice (Docs. 13, 15). The above-captioned action is DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The parties shall bear their own fees and costs. Plaintiff shall recover nothing of Defendants. The pending motions to dismiss (Docs. 5, 6, 10) are DENIED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, AS MOOT. The Clerk is DIRECTED to close this case. SO ORDERED, this 6th day of April 2026. /s/W. Louis Sands W. LOUIS SANDS, SR. JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 1 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i) provides that “[T]he Plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment[.]” Case 7:26-cv-00005-WLS Document 16 Filed 04/06/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.