7:26-cv-00009•Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA VALDOSTA DIVISION F.G.D.) Petitioner, v. Warden) IRWIN COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, et al., Respondents. CASE NO.: 7:26-CV-9 (\nS-AGH) Petitioner is a -detainee at the frwin Detention Center awaiting removal proceedings. Petitioner seeks habeas corpus relief based on Respondents'. refusal to provide Petitioner with a borid hearing and the ()pportunity for pre-removal.telea.sewhile the removal proceedings are pending. Respondents contend that Petitioner's d~tention is mandatory under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(1) and/or 8 U.S.C. § 122S(b)(2). The Court reviewed Petitioner's application. The Court finds that Petitioner is currently detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and therefore not sul:>ject to mandato1y detention as requiredby 8 U.S.C. § 1225(6)(2). 1 See J.A.1W. 11, Strteval, No. 4:25...CV-342-CDL, 2O25\XIL 3050094 (M.D. Ga: Nov. 1, 2025); P.RS. v. Streeiwl,~o. 4:25~GV-J30-CDL, 2025\VL3269947 (M.D: (3a. f'lm,;, 24, 2Q25). Accordingly, Petltlqn:e(sippli¢ati011 for .habe"s corpus relief is l To the_ :extei1f thatJbf p;tties make argume1its. b;uied _Ott ~;,bilief tliat I?etiiiQne~ti: a• Jnhnber of th~ \I361jd Eligible Clas~t c~r~fie~ jtt Ma!do1u1do. Batllista v. Santac,,rz,: N"9; $;2s~c::y.:Qt8n--S$$-aI<M, 2025 WL 371P?87' (C.D. CaL·-D~c.·1 ~. ·2025);'ahy me1nbership in that class_has'.11◊-~ffoct'bt\th.e•CotiH's d~dsiotifor seve~al±ea~otut> First, only .• we•ni111edpet,id()ners sought habeas relief in_Mdld,01idiojfi111(isiq'.> p(!~On.d.,:thei1a01e_ci-petitibners:aid : notseekt~iitiqmvide h11beas relief. Third, fo granting dedaratl)t'.yJ¢llef,:the CalifQJ;!liaDfatrkt Court C:Oxtectiy- liOted. that h~P~.s. ~egefp:>tild only be afforded to _das~ 111,eri\~¢~~-:wtw:\~¢re ,l9c~tecl ,v,itgin tl~e. boun~~#etqf. the Centrall)istrict of California. Id. at *14 (citing P.Jm1sfcld v.Patlilla,542U.S.A26,446 (2004) for the proposition that "habeas jurisdiction lie[s] 'in only one district: the district ofc(:m.finep;ie1_1t;;'). . . Case 7:26-cv-00009-WLS-AGH Document 6 Filed 01/21/26 Page 1 of 2
granted to the extent that Respondents shall provide Petitioner with a bond hearing to determine if the Petitioner may be released on bond under § 1226(a)(2) and the applicable regulations. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.1 & 1236.1. 2 SO ORDERED, this YA day of January, 2026. W~~~~GEUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT .·. ,, . ····. 2 Thebrevtty of this order is appropriate givettthatthe.issue p~~sentedJ~ exactly the sattie RS the issue previottsly· "-•• decided on numerous occasions by the Court and yetRespo11deni: insists upon denying the relief that the Court has found is requited. • Case 7:26-cv-00009-WLS-AGH Document 6 Filed 01/21/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.