Case Name in Immigration Case - Unavailable

7:26-cv-00009GamdJan 21, 2026

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA
VALDOSTA DIVISION
F.G.D.)
Petitioner,
v.
Warden) IRWIN COUNTY
DETENTION CENTER, et al.,
Respondents.
CASE NO.: 7:26-CV-9 (\nS-AGH)
Petitioner is a -detainee at the frwin Detention Center awaiting removal proceedings.
Petitioner seeks habeas corpus relief based on Respondents'. refusal to provide Petitioner with
a borid hearing and the ()pportunity for pre-removal.telea.sewhile the removal proceedings are
pending. 	Respondents contend that Petitioner's d~tention is mandatory under 8 U.S.C. §
1225(b)(1) and/or 8 U.S.C. § 122S(b)(2).
The Court reviewed Petitioner's application. 	The Court finds that Petitioner is
currently detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(a) and therefore not sul:>ject to mandato1y detention
as requiredby 8 U.S.C. § 1225(6)(2). 1 See J.A.1W. 11, Strteval, No. 4:25...CV-342-CDL, 2O25\XIL
3050094 (M.D. Ga: Nov. 1, 2025); P.RS. v. Streeiwl,~o. 4:25~GV-J30-CDL, 2025\VL3269947
(M.D: (3a. f'lm,;, 24, 2Q25). 	Accordingly, Petltlqn:e(sippli¢ati011 for .habe"s corpus relief is
l To the_ :extei1f thatJbf p;tties make argume1its. b;uied _Ott ~;,bilief tliat I?etiiiQne~ti: a• Jnhnber of th~ \I361jd
Eligible Clas~t c~r~fie~ jtt Ma!do1u1do. Batllista v. Santac,,rz,: N"9; $;2s~c::y.:Qt8n--S$$-aI<M, 2025 WL 371P?87'
(C.D. CaL·-D~c.·1 ~. ·2025);'ahy me1nbership in that class_has'.11◊-~ffoct'bt\th.e•CotiH's d~dsiotifor seve~al±ea~otut>
First, only .• we•ni111edpet,id()ners sought habeas relief in_Mdld,01idiojfi111(isiq'.> p(!~On.d.,:thei1a01e_ci-petitibners:aid :
notseekt~iitiqmvide h11beas relief. Third, fo granting dedaratl)t'.yJ¢llef,:the CalifQJ;!liaDfatrkt Court C:Oxtectiy-
liOted. that h~P~.s. ~egefp:>tild only be afforded to _das~ 111,eri\~¢~~-:wtw:\~¢re ,l9c~tecl ,v,itgin tl~e. boun~~#etqf.
the Centrall)istrict of California. Id. at *14 (citing P.Jm1sfcld v.Patlilla,542U.S.A26,446 (2004) for the proposition
that "habeas jurisdiction lie[s] 'in only one district: the district ofc(:m.finep;ie1_1t;;').	. 	.
Case 7:26-cv-00009-WLS-AGH Document 6 Filed 01/21/26 Page 1 of 2
granted to the extent that Respondents shall provide Petitioner with a bond hearing to
determine if the Petitioner may be released on bond under § 1226(a)(2) and the applicable
regulations. See 8 C.F.R. §§ 236.1 & 1236.1. 2
SO ORDERED, this YA day of January, 2026.
W~~~~GEUNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
.·. ,, 	. 	····.
2 Thebrevtty of this order is appropriate givettthatthe.issue p~~sentedJ~ exactly the sattie RS the issue previottsly· "-••
decided on numerous occasions by the Court and yetRespo11deni: insists upon denying the relief that the Court
has found is requited. 	•
Case 7:26-cv-00009-WLS-AGH Document 6 Filed 01/21/26 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.