Amacker v. New Orleans Police Department et al

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ANJELE AMACKER CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS NO: 25-1491
NEW ORLEANS POLICE DEPARTMENT, ET AL. SECTION: D
ORDER
The Court, having considered the Complaint (R. Doc. 1), the record, the
applicable law, the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (R. Doc. 6), and
the failure of plaintiff, Anjele Amacker, to file any objections to the Magistrate
Judge’s Report and Recommendation, and further, considering Plaintiff’s pro se
status, having construed the pro se Complaint liberally, and further having given
Plaintiff additional time to file objections beyond that given by the Magistrate Judge,1
hereby approves the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation and adopts it
as modified as its opinion herein.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against
defendants, the New Orleans Police Department-Fifth District, Dannye B. Jones, and
Brooks Grocery & Deli, LLC, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915e, § 1915A and, as applicable, 42 U.S.C. § 1997e, as frivolous and
for failure to state a claim for which relief can be granted.
1 Objections to the Report and Recommendation were due January 21, 2026. The Court has allowed
almost an additional month for objections to date.
Case 2:25-cv-01491-WBV Document 7 Filed 02/18/26 Page 1 of 2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claim under the Violence
Against Women Act, 34 U.S.C. § 12471, et seq. against defendants, the New Orleans
Police Department-Fifth District, Dannye B. Jones, and Brooks Grocery & Deli, LLC,
is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state a
claim upon which relief could be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915e, § 1915A and
42 U.S.C. § 1997e.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claim under Section 504 of the
Rehabilitation Act and the Americans With Disabilities Act against defendant,
Dannye B. Jones, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as frivolous and for
failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
1915e, §1915(A), and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s claim under Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000(d), et seq. against defendant, Brooks Grocery & Deli,
LLC, is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE as frivolous and for failure to state
a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915e, §1915(A),
and 42 U.S.C. § 1997e.
New Orleans, Louisiana, February 18, 2026.
______________________________
WENDY B. VITTER
United States District Judge
Case 2:25-cv-01491-WBV Document 7 Filed 02/18/26 Page 2 of 2