Pierson v. State of Louisiana et al

3:25-cv-00045LamdFeb 11, 2026

Full text

 	 	 	 	 	 	

"<)+6747"<8!)"<+668"!<< 4" 200"1!,1)<77<7*"<2847<!+60+66< .,17+'6< .+06< 6<$5+92/286< 1! (4<&,.84"<72<677"<< /+0<3846817<72< <<;< "<"4"<4"<12<2-" 7,216<72 7"<"3247 #7"4< 4"#8..:< 216+!"4+1)</+17+'6<203.,17<7*"<"3247<1!<7*"<"17+4"7: 2#<7*"<4" 24!<"(4"<7*"<2847<7*"<2847< 7*"<),6747"<8!)"6<"3247 1!<" 200"1!7,21<1!< +7<6<7*"<28476<23,1,21<,1<7*+6<077"4 24!+1).: 77< 7"< 29" 37,21"!< 7,21< "< 1!< 6< *"4":

721<28)"<28+6+1<7*,6< <%:< #<"484:<

Case 3:25-cv-00045-BAJ-RLB Document 5 02/11/26 Page 1 of 1

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 3:25-cv-00045-BAJ-RLB
Document 5 02/11/26 Page 1 of 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
ERIKA PIERSON, ET AL. CIVIL ACTION
VERSUS STATE OF LOUISIANA, ET AL.
NO. 25-00045-BAJ-RLB
RULING AND ORDER
The Magistrate Judge issued a Report And Recommendation (Doc. 4, the "Report") recommending that the Court dismiss Plaintiff's claims as frivolous and for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). There are no objections to the Report.
After carefully considering Plaintiff's Complaint, the Report, and the entirety of the record before the Court, the Court APPROVES the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and ADOPTS it as the Court's opinion in this matter.
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned action be and is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, this 1th day of February, 2026
Bia.
JUDGE BRIAN A. JACKSON UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA
AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.