3:25-cv-00803•James v. Landry et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA SHAKKA SHANEAK JAMES VERSUS JEFFLANDRY, ETAL SHAKKA SHANEAK JAMES VERSUS JEFFLANDRY, ETAL. CIVIL ACTION 25-803-SDD-RLB AND CIVIL ACTION 25-804-SDD-RLB RULING The Court has carefully considered the record, the law applicable to this action, and the Report and Recommendation^ of United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Bourgeois, Jr. dated January 6, 2026, to which an Objection2 was filed. The Court conducted a de novo review. The Court hereby approves the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge and adopts it as the Court's opinion herein. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint3 is DENIED and Plaintiff's No. 25-803-SDD-RLB and No. 25-804-SDD-RLB cases are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Signed in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, on this day of-Jantisny, 2 1 Rec. Doc. 15. 2 Rec. Doc. 16. 3Rec. Doc.11. CHIEF JUDG^SHELLY D. DICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA Case 3:25-cv-00803-SDD-RLB Document 19 02/02/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.