USA v. BROWN

2:13-cr-00071MedJan 7, 2026

Full text

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 	)
)
v. 	) 	No. 2:13-cr-0071-LEW
)
MARK BROWN, 	)
)
Defendant/Petitioner 	)
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
On October 8, 2025, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the Court his
Recommended Decision (ECF No. 79) on Defendant’s pro se Motion to Set Aside, or
Correct Sentence (2255) (ECF No. 61).
The Defendant filed his Objection to the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 80) on
October 27, 2025. 	I have reviewed and considered the Recommended Decision and
Objection, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all
matters 	adjudicated 	by 	the 	Recommended 	Decision; 	and 	I 	concur 	with 	the
recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in the
Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge
(ECF No. 79) is hereby AFFIRMED and ADOPTED.
The motion for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (ECF No. 61) is DENIED and
DISMISSED without an evidentiary hearing.
Case 2:13-cr-00071-LEW Document 82 Filed 01/07/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>
2
It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability will issue from this Court
because the Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional
right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253(c)(2).
SO ORDERED .
Dated this 7th day of January, 2026.
/s/ Lance E. Walker
Chief U.S. District Judge
Case 2:13-cr-00071-LEW Document 82 Filed 01/07/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.