2:25-cv-00650•GUZMAN JUNIOR v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY JAIL
Full text
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE JESUS MIGUEL GUZMAN JUNIOR, Petitioner, v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY JAIL, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 2:25-cv-00650-SDN ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION On January 2, 2026, the Magistrate Judge recommended dismissing Petitioner’s habeas petition after preliminary review pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), and Petitioner’s failure to follow certain procedural requirements. ECF No. 2. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. The time within which to file objections expired on January 16, 2026, and no objections have been filed, either before or after the deadline. The Court finds no clear error and agrees with the findings set forth in the Recommended Decision. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. ECF No. 2. The petition for habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED. ECF No. 1. It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability should issue in the event the Petitioner files a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). Case 2:25-cv-00650-SDN Document 3 Filed 01/27/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
2 S O ORDERED. Dated this 27th day of January, 2026. /s/ Stacey D. Neumann U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT J UDGE Case 2:25-cv-00650-SDN Document 3 Filed 01/27/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #: <pageID>
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.