GUZMAN JUNIOR v. ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY JAIL

2:25-cv-00650MedJan 27, 2026

Full text

1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
JESUS MIGUEL
GUZMAN JUNIOR,
Petitioner,
v.
ANDROSCOGGIN COUNTY JAIL,
Defendant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
2:25-cv-00650-SDN
ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION
On January 2, 2026, the Magistrate Judge recommended dismissing Petitioner’s
habeas petition after preliminary review pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing
Section 2254 Cases, Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37 (1971), and Petitioner’s failure to
follow certain procedural requirements. ECF No. 2. The Magistrate Judge notified the
parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. The
time within which to file objections expired on January 16, 2026, and no objections have
been filed, either before or after the deadline.
The Court finds no clear error and agrees with the findings set forth in the
Recommended Decision. It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of
the Magistrate Judge is AFFIRMED and ADOPTED. ECF No. 2. The petition for habeas
relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED. ECF No. 1. It is further ORDERED that
no certificate of appealability should issue in the event the Petitioner files a notice of
appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right
within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
Case 2:25-cv-00650-SDN Document 3 Filed 01/27/26 Page 1 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>
2
S O ORDERED.
Dated this 27th day of January, 2026.
/s/ Stacey D. Neumann
U NITED S TATES D ISTRICT J UDGE
Case 2:25-cv-00650-SDN Document 3 Filed 01/27/26 Page 2 of 2 PageID #:
<pageID>

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.