2:22-cr-20412•United States of America v. Scott
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, Case No. 22-20412 v. HON. MARK A. GOLDSMITH TERRY L. SCOTT, JR., Defendant. ________________________/ ORDER ACCEPTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO FILE REPLY (Dkt. 58) On November 19, 2025, the Court received a letter from Defendant Terry L. Scott. 11/19/25 Letter (Dkt. 58). In it, he explains that he mailed a reply brief to his pending motion under 18 U.S.C. § 2255, via certified and tracked United States mail. He attached a photo copy of his certified mail receipt, which is stamped with a date of July 23, 2025. Id. at PageID.327. He states that this brief was returned to him undelivered, and enclosed a copy the undelivered return to sender envelope dated November 7, 2025. Id. at PageID.326. Scott asks the Court to accept his reply brief for filing, despite it being past due. The reply is not enclosed with his request. In its discretion, the Court will accept Scott’s reply brief. Scott is ordered to mail his reply brief to the Court no later than December 8, 2025. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 21, 2025 s/Mark A. Goldsmith Detroit, Michigan MARK A. GOLDSMITH United States District Judge Case 2:22-cr-20412-MAG-DRG ECF No. 60, PageID.<pageID> Filed 11/21/25 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.