2:25-cv-10035•Abdofara v. Dunlap et al
Full text
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MAJID ABDOFARA Plaintiff, Case No. 25-cv-10035 Honorable Linda V. Parker v. ROBERT DUNLAP, et al., Defendants. __________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (ECF NO. 28), GRANTING MOTION TO SEVER (ECF NO. 21), AND DENYING MOTION TO CONSOLIDATE (ECF NO. 24) Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee at the Wayne County Adult Detention Center, commenced this lawsuit against eight individuals on January 6, 2025. (ECF No. 1.) Defendants filed a motion to sever on June 30, 2025 (ECF No. 21), and Plaintiff filed a motion to consolidate on July 21, 2025 (ECF No. 24.) The matter has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Kimberly G. Altman for all pretrial proceedings, including a hearing and determination of all non-dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and/or a report and recommendation on all dispositive matters pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). On October 9, 2025, Magistrate Judge Altman issued a report and recommendation (“R&R”) recommending that the Court grant Defendants’ motion Case 2:25-cv-10035-LVP-KGA ECF No. 29, PageID.<pageID> Filed 10/30/25 Page 1 of 3
2 and deny Plaintiff’s motion. (ECF No. 28.) At the conclusion of the R&R, Magistrate Judge Altman advises the parties that they may object to and seek review of the R&R within fourteen days of service upon them. She further specifically advises the parties that “[f]ailure to file specific objections constitutes a waiver of any further right to appeal.” (Id.) Neither party filed objections to the R&R. The Court has carefully reviewed the R&R and concurs with the conclusions reached by Magistrate Judge Altman. The Court therefore adopts the R&R. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to consolidate (ECF No. 24) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ motion to sever (ECF No. 21) is GRANTED and Plaintiff’s claims against the following Defendants are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE: Robert Dunlap, Rose, Mitchell, Holman, Wilson, and Dennis. These individuals are TERMINATED AS PARTIES to this action. Only Plaintiff’s claim against Corporal Deputy Sumera, alleging an assault based on ethnicity in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, will proceed in this action. s/ Linda V. Parker LINDA V. PARKER U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: October 30, 2025 Case 2:25-cv-10035-LVP-KGA ECF No. 29, PageID.<pageID> Filed 10/30/25 Page 2 of 3
3 I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed to counsel of record and/or pro se parties on this date, October 30, 2025, by electronic and/or U.S. First Class mail. s/Aaron Flanigan Case Manager Case 2:25-cv-10035-LVP-KGA ECF No. 29, PageID.<pageID> Filed 10/30/25 Page 3 of 3
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.