1:23-cv-00618•HOLMAN v. WIGGS et al
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA QUENTON D. HOLMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:23-cv-618 ) A.T. WIGGS, N.C. ALE Special ) Agent, K. KLUTTZ, N.C. ALE ) Special Agent, and UNIDENTIFIED ) DUKE CAMPUS POLICE OFFICER, ) ) Defendants. ) ORDER On February 4, 2026, the United States Magistrate Judge’s Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation (“Recommendation”) was filed and notice was served on the parties pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636. (Docs. 38, 39.) No objections were filed within the time limits prescribed by Section 636. Therefore, the court need not make a de novo review and the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation is hereby adopted. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, (Doc. 38), is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 33), is DENIED. Case 1:23-cv-00618-WO-LPA Document 40 Filed 03/05/26 Page 1 of 2
- 2 - This the 5th day of March, 2026. __________________________________ United States District Judge Case 1:23-cv-00618-WO-LPA Document 40 Filed 03/05/26 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.