1:25-cv-00193•SMITH v. DUDEK
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA BILLY S., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) 1:25CV193 ) FRANK BISIGNANO, ) COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER On December 23, 2025, the Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and notice was served on the parties in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Plaintiff objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. 14.) The court has carefully reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge’s report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s report. The court finds that the objections do not change the substance of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, and the court therefore adopts the Recommendation. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the final decision of the Commissioner is UPHELD. /s/ Thomas D. Schroeder United States District Judge February 26, 2026 Case 1:25-cv-00193-TDS-JGM Document 15 Filed 02/26/26 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.