FIERRO et al v. HAMMER et al

1 printed pages contain little extracted OCR body text; searchable legal-body completeness has not been established for those pages.

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
JESUS FIERRO, et al., )
Plaintiffs,
)
) V. )
1:25CV416
)
ZACHARY TAYLOR HAMMER, et al., )
)
Defendants.
)
ORDER
On November 21, 2025, the Memorandum Opinion and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge was filed and notice was served on the parties in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b). Plaintiffs objected to the Recommendation. (Doc. 17.) Defendants filed a response. (Doc. 18.)
The court has carefully reviewed the portions of the Magistrate Judge's report to which objection was made and has made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge's report. The court finds that the objections do not change the substance of the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation, and the court therefore adopts the Recommendation.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the motion (Doc. 8) is GRANTED and this action be DISMISSED.
/s/ Thomas D. Schroeder January 13, 2026
United States District Judge
AUTHENTICATED U.S. GOVERNMENT INFORMATION GPO
)
Case 1:25-cv-00416-TDS-LPA Document 19
Filed 01/13/26 Page 1 of 2

January , 2026

Case 1:25-cv-00416-TDS-LPA Documenti9 _ Filed 01/13/26 Page 2 of 2