HINTON v. STEIN et al

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA
CHARLES EVERETTE HINTON, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	)
)
v. 	) 	1:25CV619
)
JOSHUA STEIN, et al., 	)
)
Defendants. 	)
ORDER
On July 22, 2025, the Order and Recommendation of the United
States 	Magistrate 	Judge 	was 	filed 	and 	notice 	was 	served 	on 	the
parties 	in 	accordance 	with 	28 	U.S.C. 	§ 	636(b). 	Objections 	were
filed within the time limits prescribed by section 636. 	(Doc. 4.)
Although 	the 	objections 	are 	not 	specific 	and 	fail 	to 	invoke
this court’s de novo review, the court has nevertheless carefully
reviewed 	the 	portions 	of 	the 	Magistrate 	Judge’s 	report 	and 	has
made a de novo determination in accord with the Magistrate Judge’s
report. 	The 	court 	finds 	that 	the 	objections 	do 	not 	change 	the
substance of the Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation, and the court
therefore adopts the Recommendation.
IT 	IS 	THEREFORE 	ORDERED 	that 	this 	action 	is 	dismissed 	sua
sponte without prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new action, on the
§ 	1983 	forms, 	which 	corrects 	the 	defects 	noted 	by 	the 	Magistrate
Judge.
/s/ 	Thomas D. Schroeder
January 13, 2026 	United States District Judge
Case 1:25-cv-00619-TDS-LPA Document 5 Filed 01/13/26 Page 1 of 1