1:24-cv-00149•Frost, et al v. Hilliard Law, et al
Full text
! !"#$ $ % # #& '()& *#$ (+)(& (, #, ! ( *- , .( & , #, ( *- .#/#(( )*& , # )! & , #$ $ ( #%& '$ #! , ! - - & 0 (, #$ 0 (- ( #, 0 11111111111111111111111111111111111 23456 758 39 5 : ;5 <3=9 : 3> ? @3: A 3> : 3 BA 6 4A 6 6 CD ?A >: A 8 8 E 6 F45>G5GHIJKL MN OP Q R N L ST UV WSR SOTMOP X YSX L N S ZM[ N S \SM[ TSOQ ]P P N L N I ^N O_SO`I HIL SL L MQ abTV cd eIO`ML SX Q f [ Q aIUS[ P HM[ L gN L L N M[ TQ gN L L N M[ T YMhQ gN L L N M[ T ZM[ P N OS` eIO`ML SX Q YYiQ f IjO \[ MOTIOZM[ P N OS`Q ZMP P jSh YVL S Z_ZbL L SOQ ZIX X k HIL SL L MQ iHQ ZM[ N IO ZMlTML SOS aSN L L VQ MOT ]OMYbN X M mMUML lIN P N Md n WI_d oId pqr d iL MN OP N R R R N L ST MO ]JSOTST HIJKL MN OP IO sSKP SJUS[ pQ tutvd n WI_d oId pwr d \S_MbX SiL MN OP N R R jMX R N L ST MO ]JSOTST HIJKL MN OP Q P jS KSOTN Ol JIP N IO P I TN X JN X X P jS x[ N lN OML HIJKL MN OP N X JIIP d sSS yIbOl zd HN P V IR ZIbOP aMON S[ Q tpw cd pT {q|Q {|p n vP j HN [ d tuur } ~;5 5>59 ?D [ bL S d d d N X P jMP MO MJSOTST KL SMTN Ol X bKS[ X STSX P jS I[ N lN OML KL SMTN OlQ [ SOTS[ N Ol P jS I[ N lN OML KL SMTN Ol IR OI SR R S_P r b[ OS[ zd
N ljP Q t cd sbKKd tT pQ p| n Wd ZTd tuutr n TSOVN Ol MX JIIP JIP N IOX P I TN X JN X X I[ N lN OML _IJKL MN OP IO l[ IbOTX P jMP MJSOTST _IJKL MN OP X bKS[ X STSTI[ N lN OML _IJKL MN OP r d P jMP Case 1:24-cv-00149-MOC-WCM Document 44 Filed 09/23/24 Page 1 of 2Signed: September 23, 2024 Case 1:24-cv-00149-MOC-WCM Document 44 Filed 09/23/24 Page 2 of 2
OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:24-cv-149-MOC-WCM KRISTINA RENE FROST, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Shawna Rene Frost and Tristan Allen Mays, Plaintiff, vs. ORDER HILLIARD LAW, et al., Defendant. se a a 44 4 444444) _4>,_4>_4 THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, filed by Defendants Leslie Marie Bearden, Attilio Vincenzo Colella, Rudy F. Gonzales, Jr, Robert Carl Hilliard, Hilliard Law, Hilliard Martinez Gonzales, LLP, John Brandon Martinez, Matthew Lyle McMullen, Moss & Colella, PC, Marion Magdalene Reilly, and Ana Luisa Zabalgoitia. (Doc. No. 36). Plaintiff filed an Amended Complaint on September 3, 2024. (Doc. No. 38). Because Plaintiff has filed an Amended Complaint, the pending motion to dismiss the Original Complaint is moot. See Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001) (“The general rule ... is that an amended pleading supersedes the original pleading, rendering the original pleading of no effect.”); Turner v. Kight, 192 F. Supp. 2d 391, 397 (D. Md. 2002) (denying as moot motions to dismiss original complaint on grounds that amended complaint superseded original complaint). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1 INFORMATION GPO oe 1:24-cv-00149-MOC-WCM Document 44 _ Filed 09/23/24 Page1of2 (1) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, (Doc. No. 36), is DENIED as moot. Signed: September 23, 2024 Max O. Cogburn Jr United States District Judge 2 Case 1:24-cv-00149-MOC-WCM Document 44 _ Filed 09/23/24 Page 2 of 2
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.