3:17-cr-00134•USA v. Addison et al
Full text
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:17-cr-134-FDW-DSC-72 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ORDER ISAIAH DEVON STALLWORTH, ) ) Defendant. ) ____________________________________ ) THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant’s pro se Motion Pursuant to Rule 6 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings [Doc. 2399]. In his Motion, dated January 28, 2019, the Defendant seeks two docket entries from this case “to assist [him] in exercising [his] rights to collaterally attack [his] detention pursuant to Section § 2255….” [Doc. 2399 at 1]. The Motion is moot because the Defendant subsequently filed a Motion to Vacate, Case No. 3:19-cv-495-FDW, which has now been dismissed and denied. [Doc. 2798]; see also United States v. Stallworth, 809 F. App’x 179 (4th Cir. 2020), cert. denied 141 S.Ct. 2524 (2021). Accordingly, the instant Motion is denied as moot. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that Defendant’s pro se Motion Pursuant to Rule 6 of the Rules Governing § 2255 Proceedings [Doc. 2399] is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed: June 10, 2022 Case 3:17-cr-00134-FDW-MTO Document 3364 Filed 06/10/22 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.