3:18-cr-00099•USA v. Farris
Full text
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA CHARLOTTE DIVISION 3:18-CR-00099-RJC-DCK THIS MATTER is before the Court on the defendant’s pro se Motion for Preservation of Evidence. (Doc. No. 142). In the motion, the defendant seeks entry of an order directing the government to preserve any evidence or other information relating in any way to his case until he has had the opportunity to inspect such records. (Id. at 1-2). Local Criminal Rule 55-2 and Local Civil Rule 79.1 govern the custody and disposition of trial evidence. The defendant has not shown any legal authority to require expanded preservation while he pursues post-conviction relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Motion for Preservation of Evidence, (Doc. No. 142), is DENIED. USA ) ) v. ) ORDER ) GARLIN RAYMOND FARRIS ) ) Signed: December 2, 2021 Case 3:18-cr-00099-MOC-DCK Document 149 Filed 12/02/21 Page 1 of 1
Wondering how this text applies to your situation?
Free consultation, no commitment
Describe your situation. Our team will contact you by email about your consultation.
Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.