Johnsrud et al v. Burlington Resources Oil and Gas Co. LP

1:17-cv-00209NddFeb 23, 2018

Full text

Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 1 of 7
Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 2 of 7
Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 3 of 7
Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 4 of 7
Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 5 of 7
Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 6 of 7
Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 7 of 7

OCR transcription for search; preserved printed pages are authoritative

Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 1 of 7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT
OF NORTH DAKOTA WESTERN DIVISION

Civil No: 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM
MARK and MARIBETH JOHNSRUD,

Plaintiffs,

BURLINGTON RESOURCES OIL AND

)
)
)
)
VS. )
)
)
GAS CO., LP, )

)

)

Defendant.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER

Upon stipulation of the parties for an order pursuant to Fed. R.Civ. P. 26(c) that

confidential information be disclosed only in designated ways:

1. As used in the Protective Order, these terms have the following meanings:

a. “Attorneys” means counsel of record;

b. “Confidential” documents are documents designated pursuant to paragraph 2;
Cc. “Documents” are all materials within the scope of Fed. R. Civ. P. 34;

d. “Outside Vendors” means messenger, copy, coding, and other clerical-services

vendors not employed by a party or its Attorneys; and
Pan A Party may designate a document “Confidential”, to protect information within

the scope of Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c).

AUTHENTICATED
U.S. GOVERNMENT
INFORMATION

GPO

Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 2 of 7

a. All Confidential documents, along with the information contained in the
documents, shall be used solely for the purpose of this action, and no person receiving such
documents shall, directly or indirectly, use, transfer, disclose, or communicate in any way the
documents or their contents to any person other than those specified in paragraph 4. Any other
use is prohibited.

4, Access to any Confidential document shall be limited to:

(a) the Court and its staff;

(b) Attorneys, their law firms, and their Outside Vendors;

(c) persons shown on the face of the document to have authored or received it;

(d) court reporters retained to transcribe testimony;

(e) the parties;

(f) outside independent persons (i.e., persons not currently or formerly employed by,
consulting with, or otherwise associated with any party) who are retained by a party or its
Attorneys to provide assistance as mock jurors or focus group members or the like, or to furnish
technical or expert services, and/or to give testimony in this action.

Be Each person appropriately designated pursuant to paragraphs 4(f) to receive
Confidential information shall execute an exact copy of the document entitled “DECLARATION
OF INTENT TO COMPLY WITH AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING
CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION” which is attached and marked as Exhibit A. The parties
shall retain copies of the originals of these agreements and shall deliver copies to the opposing

counsel upon the completion of the litigation.

Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 3 of 7

6. All depositions or portions of depositions taken in this action that contain
confidential information may be designated “Confidential” and thereby obtain the protections
accorded other “Confidential” documents. Confidentiality designations for depositions shall be
made either on the record or by written notice to the other party within 14 days of receipt of the
transcript. Unless otherwise agreed, depositions shall be treated as “Confidential” during the 14-
day period following receipt of the transcript. The deposition of any witness (or any portion of
such deposition) that encompasses Confidential information shall be taken only in the presence
of persons who are qualified to have access to such information.

Ts Any party who inadvertently fails to identify documents as “Confidential” shall,
promptly upon discovery of its oversight, provide written notice of the error and substitute
appropriately-designated documents. Any party receiving such improperly-designated
documents shall retrieve such documents from persons not entitled to receive those documents
and, upon receipt of the substitute documents, shall return or destroy the improperly-designated
documents.

8. Ifa party wishes to file a document containing another party’s Confidential
information with the Court, it shall provide 3 days’ notice to the other party. The parties shall
meet and confer regarding whether such information can be publicly filed and whether any
concerns could be remedied by redacting Confidential information. If the parties do not agree,
the party that opposes the public filing must file a motion to seal with the Court. In the case of an
impending deadline, the party wishing to file the Confidential information shall file a redacted

version of the information until the Court rules on the opposing party’s motion to seal. Upon

Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 4 of 7

ruling by the Court, the party wishing to file the information shall re-file in accordance with the
Court’s order.

9. Any party may request a change in the designation of any information designated
“Confidential”. Ifa party contends that any material is not entitled to Confidential treatment,
such party may at any time give written notice to the party or non-party who designated the
material. The party or non-party who designated the material shall have twenty-one (21) days
from the receipt of such written notice to apply to the Court for an order designating the material
as Confidential. The party or non-party seeking the order has the burden of establishing that the
document is entitled to protection.

10.‘ _Ifa party inadvertently discloses documents that contain privileged information,
or information otherwise immune from discovery, that party shall, promptly upon discovery of
such inadvertent disclosure, so advise the receiving party and request that the documents be
returned. The receiving party shall return such inadvertently produced documents, including all
copies, within 14 days of receiving such a written request. The party returning such inadvertently
produced documents may thereafter seek re-production of any such documents pursuant to
applicable law. Further, if a party receives documents it reasonably believes to be privileged, it
will notify the opposing party in writing within 5 days to determine whether a claim of privilege
will be asserted.

11. Within 60 days of the termination of this action, including any appeals, each party
shall either destroy or return to the opposing party all documents designated by the opposing
party as “Confidential”, and all copies of such documents, and shall destroy all extracts and/or

data taken from such documents. Each party shall provide a certification as to such return or

Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 5 of 7

destruction within the 60-day period. However, Attorneys shall be entitled to retain a set of all
documents filed with the Court and all correspondence generated in connection with the action,
including any documents filed with the Court under seal.

12. Any party may apply to the Court for a modification of the Protective Order, and
nothing in this Protective Order shall be construed to prevent a party from seeking such further
provisions enhancing or limiting confidentiality as may be appropriate.

13. No action taken in accordance with the Protective Order shall be construed as a
waiver of any claim or defense in the action or of any position as to discoverability or
admissibility of evidence.

14. _—_ By entering this order and limiting the disclosure of information in this case, the
Court does not intend to preclude another court from finding that information may be relevant
and subject to disclosure in another case. Any person or party subject to this order who becomes
subject to a motion to disclose another party’s information designated as “Confidential” pursuant
to this order shall promptly notify that party of the motion so that the party may have an
opportunity to appear and be heard on whether that information should be disclosed.

15, The terms of this Protective Order do not preclude, limit, restrict, or otherwise
apply to the use of documents at trial.

16. The obligations imposed by the Protective Order shall survive the termination of

this action.

Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 6 of 7

STIPULATED TO: February 22, 2018

/s/ Kyra Hill /s/ Jennifer §. Allen

Derrick Braaten (ND 06394) Jonathon D. Bergman (ND 07745)

Kyra Hill (ND 08443) Jennifer S. Allen

BRAATEN LAW FIRM DAVIS GRAHAM & STUBBS LLP

109 N. 4" St., Suite 100 1550 17" Street, Suite 500

Bismarck, ND 58501 Denver, CO 80202

Tel: (701) 221-2911 Tel: (303) 892-9400

Fax: (701) 221-5842 Fax: (303) 893-1379

Email: derrick@braatenlawfirm.,com Email: jon.bergman@dgslaw.com
kyra@braatenlawfirm.com jennifer.allen@dgslaw.com

Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorneys for Defendant

SO ORDERED this > 9 of _ Ab vine, oy 2018

—DanieH-Hoviand. Clas 6 94 &,, T-

United States District Judge 7/2 , chels S4p<

Case 1:17-cv-00209-DLH-CSM Document 21 Filed 02/23/18 Page 7 of 7

EXHIBIT A

DECLARATION OF INTENT TO COMPLY WITH AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER
REGARDING CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION

Acknowledgment and Non-Disclosure Agreement

I, , hereby acknowledge that I have received a

copy of the Protective Order entered in this action, that I agree to be bound by its terms, that I
will comply with the terms of the Protective Order in handling or using any confidential
documents or other materials subject to the Protective Order, that I will not disclose any
confidential documents or materials to any unauthorized person or entity, and that I will destroy
or return all confidential documents, any copies of such documents, and any extracts and/or data
taken therefrom within 60 days of termination of the action, including any appeals. I further
acknowledge that I will be subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. District Court for the District of
North Dakota for the purpose of enforcing the Protective Order.

Dated this __ day of 2018.

(Print Name)

(Address)

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.