USA v. Gutierrez et al

1:19-cr-00029NddSep 9, 2019

Full text

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA
United States of America, 	)
)
Plaintiff, 	) 	INTERSTATE AGREEMENT ON
) 	DETAINERS ORDER
vs. 	)
) 	Case No.: 1:19-cr-029
Lisa Marie Anderson, 	)
)
Defendant. 	)
On September 9, 2019, defendant made her initial appearance and was arraigned in the
above-entitled action. AUSA Rick Volk appeared on behalf of the United States. Attorney Scott
Brand was appointed to represent defendant in this matter and appeared on his behalf.
Prior to her initial appearance, defendant was in State custody at the Bismarck Transition
Center in Bismarck, North Dakota. After the Indictment in this case was returned and an arrest
warrant issued, a detainer was filed by the United States with the North Dakota prison officials.
Pursuant to the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act (“IADA”), defendant’s appearance before
this court for his initial appearance and arraignment was secured by a writ of habeas corpus ad
prosequendum.
At her initial appearance and arraignment, defendant was advised of her rights under the
IADA to continued federal custody until the charges set forth in the Indictment are adjudicated.
Defendant waived in open court the anti-shuttling provisions of the IADA and agreed to return to
the custody of the State of North Dakota (the “sending state” under the IADA) pending further
proceedings in this case initiated by the United States (the “receiving state” under the IADA).
1
Case 1:19-cr-00029-DMT Document 119 Filed 09/09/19 Page 1 of 2
The court accepts defendant’s waiver, finding that it was made knowingly and intelligently,
voluntarily, and upon advice of counsel. Accordingly, defendant is remanded to the custody of the
United States Marshal's Service for the purpose of returning defendant to the custody of the "sending
state," where he shall be housed pending further proceedings or until further order of the court.
Further, pursuant to defendant’s waiver, the return of the defendant to his place of incarceration
pending trial shall not be grounds under the IADA for dismissal of the charges set forth in the
Indictment.
Dated this 9th day of September, 2019
/s/ Clare R. Hochhalter
Clare R. Hochhalter, Magistrate Judge
United States District Court
2
Case 1:19-cr-00029-DMT Document 119 Filed 09/09/19 Page 2 of 2

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.